Any author who writes on a highly controversial topic will receive negative reviews. And my topic is certainly one of the most controversial issues one could choose to write on.
I’d like, then, to present the second written review I’ve received, and the first negative one. It comes from Citizen Wells of citizenwells.com. Here’s an excerpt:
“I was leaning toward giving John Woodman more benefit of the doubt. However, after mulling this over for a few more minutes a disturbing trend or puzzle picture emerged. A number of things Mr. Woodman has stated, used as evidence or omitted concern me. Whether this occurred at the subsconscious level or intentional level I do not know. John Woodman has stated and the premise of his book is debunking the debunkers. He seems more concerned about doing this than arriving at the truth about Obama’s eligibility and whether or not the image placed on WhiteHouse.gov proves a Hawaiian birth for Obama.”
Mr. Wells’ full review (which I will respond to later) can be viewed here.